Answer:
A.
Explanation:
How was the African for of socialism unique
the major factor that delayed texas annexation until 1845 was:____
The major factor that delayed Texas annexation until 1845 was the issue of slavery.
Texas had gained independence from Mexico in 1836 and sought to be annexed by the United States. However, the annexation of Texas was a contentious issue in the United States due to the debate over the expansion of slavery.At the time, Texas was a slave-holding territory, and its annexation would upset the balance between free and slave states in Congress. Northern states opposed the annexation of Texas because it would likely lead to the expansion of slavery and increase the political power of slaveholding states in the Senate. As a result, the issue of Texas annexation became highly politicized and divided along sectional lines. It took several years of political maneuvering and negotiations before Texas was finally annexed by a joint resolution of the United States Congress in 1845, making it the 28th state of the Union.Therefore, the major factor that delayed Texas annexation until 1845 was the controversy and debate over the expansion of slavery.
To know more about United States Congress, click here https://brainly.com/question/13965478
#SPJ11
Pls help me on my history homework
what was the rate of the pacific plate motion relative to the hawaiian hotspot as it was developing the 2,300 km long emperor seamount chain from 65 myr to 42 myr? express the rate in cm/yr.
The Hawaiian-Emperor seamount chain is an example of the interaction between hotspots and tectonic plates. The chain is an important feature of the Pacific Ocean and provides insights into the history of the Earth.
The Hawaiian-Emperor seamount chain is a chain of volcanoes that stretches across the Pacific Ocean. It extends for 5,800 km from the Hawaiian Islands to the Aleutian Trench near Alaska.
The chain consists of over 80 volcanoes, most of which are seamounts. These seamounts are either extinct or dormant. It is thought that the chain was formed by a combination of hotspots and the movement of tectonic plates. The hotspot that created the Hawaiian Islands is currently situated under the Big Island. However, this hotspot has been moving over time. At one point, it was situated under Kauai. The Hawaiian-Emperor seamount chain was formed over a period of 80 million years. It began forming around 85 million years ago and continued to form until around 45 million years ago. During this time, the Pacific Plate moved over the hotspot. As the plate moved, it left a trail of volcanoes in its wake. The movement of the plate and the creation of the seamounts were not uniform. Instead, there were periods of rapid movement and periods of slow movement. For example, between 65 and 42 million years ago, the Pacific Plate moved at an average rate of 9 cm per year. During this time, the hotspot created a chain of volcanoes that stretched for over 2,300 km. The rate of motion was not constant, however. Instead, it varied. During the first 20 million years, the rate of motion was around 12 cm per year. However, between 55 and 50 million years ago, the rate of motion slowed to around 4 cm per year. Overall, the Hawaiian-Emperor seamount chain is an example of the interaction between hotspots and tectonic plates. The chain is an important feature of the Pacific Ocean and provides insights into the history of the Earth.
To know more about Hawaiian-Emperor visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32176926
#SPJ11
Malala claims that the Taliban is anti-education due to a fear that education leads to Westernization. How does Malala, an educated fifteen-year-old Pakistani, confirm or contradict these fears? Answer in an essay of at least 300 words, using evidence from the excerpt.
Malala's commitment to instruction and promotion against the Taliban's onerous administration negates their fear of instruction driving to Westernization.
Title: Malala Yousafzai: A Guide of Instruction and Strength Against Taliban's Anti-Education Position
Introduction:
Malala Yousafzai, a taught fifteen-year-old Pakistani, epitomizes the inconsistency of the Taliban's fear that instruction leads to Westernization.
Her immovable devotion to instruction and her exceptional flexibility in the confront of misfortune highlight her as a confirmation of the transformative control of instruction.
Through her claim encounters and activities, Malala exposes the Taliban's anti-education position, emphasizing the fundamental part of instruction in engaging people and cultivating advance.
Body Sections:
Firstly, Malala's claim commitment to instruction, in spite of being focused on by the Taliban, serves as a clear inconsistency to their claim.
In her energetic backing for girls' instruction, Malala firmly believes that instruction may be a widespread right and a crucial instrument for social improvement.
By bravely talking out against the harsh administration, she has gotten to be a persuasive voice for instruction, illustrating that information and strengthening are not kept to any specific culture or belief system.
Furthermore, Malala's instructive travel, as portrayed within the portion, exhibits the transformative control of learning.
Her interest in instruction drove her to create basic considering abilities, a sense of self-worth, and a profound appreciation for the control of information.
By picking up an instruction, she was able to challenge the conventional standards and desires set on ladies in her society, pushing for sex uniformity and rousing millions around the world.
Besides, Malala's accentuation on the importance of instruction as a implies to counter radical belief systems specifically negates the Taliban's fears.
Instead of being a pathway to Westernization, instruction prepares people with the apparatuses to lock in basically with distinctive points of view, cultivating resistance, sympathy, and a broader understanding of the world.
Malala's endeavors to advance instruction emphasize the part it plays in countering radicalization and building comprehensive social orders.
Conclusion:
Malala Yousafzai's story represents the control of instruction to negate the Taliban's fear that instruction leads to Westernization.
Her unflinching commitment to instruction, her individual development, and her backing for sex correspondence highlight the transformative effect instruction can have on people and communities.
By standing up against the onerous administration and advancing instruction as a widespread right, Malala exhibits the positive potential instruction holds, dispersing the idea that it essentially leads to Westernization.
Instep, instruction gets to be a guide of trust, strengthening, and advance, independent of social or ideological boundaries.
Learn more about Malala here;
https://brainly.com/question/14781739
#SPJ1
what are 5-10 black athletes that were born between 1600s-1877
Five athletes who were blacks and were born between 1600s-1877: Francis Williams, Tom Molineaux, Bill Richmond, Moses Fleetwood Walker, Isaac Murphy.
Who are these Athletes?Here are five prominent black athletes who were born between the 1600s and 1877:
Francis Williams (about 1700-1770) was a Jamaican-born scholar and athlete who attended Cambridge University in England. He was well-known for both his cerebral accomplishments and his athletic prowess in cricket.Tom Molineaux (1784-1818) was a notable American-born boxer who rose to prominence in England in the early nineteenth century. Despite racial prejudice, he rose to become one of the most notable pugilists of his generation.Bill Richmond (1763-1829): Bill Richmond, frequently famous as the "Black Terror," was an African American prizefighter who red-pink to outstandingness in England in the late 18th and early 19th of one hundred years. He was the first important African American prizefighter and faced various notable oppositions.Moses Fleetwood Walker (1856-1924): Moses Fleetwood Walker was a professional baseball catcher in the late nineteenth of one hundred years. When he linked the Toledo Blue Stockings of the American Association in 1884, he became the first African American to play in the great leagues.Isaac Murphy (1861-1896): Isaac Murphy was an American jockey who was one of horse racing's most successful riders. He was known for his remarkable skills and clever race-riding ability and won three Kentucky Derbys (1884, 1890, and 1891).Learn more about athletes here: https://brainly.com/question/31767192
#SPJ1
what made africa a prosperous continent
Answer:
because.
Explanation:
Africa is rich in natural resources ranging from arable land, water, oil, natural gas, minerals, forests and wildlife. The continent holds a huge proportion of the world's natural resources, both renewables and non-renewables.
True or false A census is a count of citizens used to determine the amount of taxes they would pay
Answer:
False
It determines the funding that will support countries and communities or how they will distribute funds......
Explanation:
To what extent was the Iranian Revolution of 1979 a success? Explain in a thoughtful and thorough paragraph.
Answer:
I think the Iranian Revolution of 1979 was a mixed success. On one hand, it succeeded in overthrowing the repressive regime of the Shah and establishing an Islamic republic. This gave the Iranian people a greater voice in their government and allowed for some social and economic reforms. On the other hand, the new government was also repressive in its own way, with strict enforcement of Islamic law and suppression of political opposition. The revolution also had negative consequences for Iran's relationship with the international community, particularly the United States. Ultimately, the success of the revolution depends on one's perspective and priorities
Help is due today
Push and Pull Factors for immigration.
This is the topic
The push factors of China are natural disasters, famine and bad economic opportunities. The pull factors of China are gold and economic opportunities in the United States. The push factors of Japan United States annexed in Hawaii and immigration. In the United States, Chinese Immigrants helped to build the transcontinental railroad. They worked jobs like farming, mining, housekeeping and laundry workers.
Push factors encourage people to depart their homes and relocate, whereas pull factors attract migrants to new areas. High unemployment, for example, is a common push factor, whereas an abundance of jobs is an effective pull factor.
Push factors are distinguished from pull factors, which are the conditions that entice people to relocate to a specific location. Both are intertwined, because the push factors motivate people to leave their current location, whereas the pull factors influence their choice of country, state, or municipality.
Learn more about factors, here:
https://brainly.com/question/18831390
#SPJ1
In 250 words reflect on the institutional design created by the
Framers in the U.S. Constitution. Is it rational? Explain. Which
features would you have changed and why?
The institutional design created by the Framers in the U.S. Constitution can be viewed as a rational system, given the historical context and objectives they sought to achieve.
The Constitution established a federal system with a separation of powers and a system of checks and balances to prevent the concentration of power and protect individual liberties.
One rational feature of the institutional design is the separation of powers among the three branches of government: the executive, legislative, and judicial branches. This division of powers helps ensure that no single branch becomes too dominant or tyrannical. Each branch has specific powers and limitations, providing a system of checks and balances. For instance, the president can veto legislation passed by Congress, but Congress can override the veto with a two-thirds majority vote.
Additionally, the creation of a bicameral legislature, with the House of Representatives and the Senate, reflects a rational approach. It strikes a balance between proportional representation and equal representation among the states. The House of Representatives is designed to reflect population size, ensuring that larger states have a proportional voice, while the Senate grants equal representation to all states, regardless of size. This compromise aimed to prevent the domination of smaller states while considering the concerns of larger ones.
Learn more about Constitution link:
https://brainly.com/question/30337690
#SPJ1#SPJ11
"Northerners did everything they could to circumvent the old Fugitive Slave
Act." In this passage, the word circumvent implies that
A.Northerners strongly supported the law.
B. Northerners were indifferent about the law.
C. Northerners wanted a much stronger, tougher law passed to replace the original act.
D. Northerners hated the law and tried to find ways around it.
Answer:
Yes, Northerners did everything they could to circumvent the old Fugitive Slave Law, which allowed the slaveholders to reclaim escaped slaves even if they were living in free states. The Fugitive Slave Act was heavily opposed by the abolitionists in the North, who organized efforts to free escaped slaves and provided shelters and other forms of support to those on the run. Additionally, many Northerners enacted personal policies of 'slave resistance', in which they refused to assist slaveholders in retrieving their 'property' and instead offered them refuge and protection.
The correct option is D. Northerners hated the law and tried to find ways around it.What is the meaning of the word "circumvent"?The word "circumvent" means to find a way around something, or to avoid something cleverly. In this context, "circumvent" implies that Northerners did not support the Fugitive Slave Act and found ways to avoid or get around it.The Fugitive Slave Act was a law passed in 1850 that required people in the North to help capture and return escaped slaves to their owners in the South. Many Northerners opposed this law and felt that it was immoral. As a result, they tried to help escaped slaves to avoid being caught and returned to slavery.
Explanation:
Do you think Mexican Americans and Hutterites have experienced more prejudice than other ethnic minorities in the state? Why or why not?
The extent of prejudice experienced by Mexican Americans, Hutterites, and other ethnic minorities can vary depending on various factors and should be analyzed on a case-by-case basis.
Prejudice can vary based on various factors such as historical background, cultural dynamics, socioeconomic status, and geographic location.
Mexican Americans, as one of the largest ethnic minority groups in the United States, have faced significant challenges including stereotypes, discrimination, and anti-immigrant sentiment. Hutterites, a religious communal group, may face prejudice due to their distinctive lifestyle and practices.
The extent of prejudice experienced by any ethnic group is influenced by complex societal factors, regional attitudes, and historical context. It is important to consider individual experiences within specific communities and regions, rather than making broad generalizations.
Research studies and firsthand accounts from affected individuals can provide more insight into the unique experiences of Mexican Americans, Hutterites, and other ethnic minorities in a given state.
For more such question on prejudice
https://brainly.com/question/25189630
#SPJ8
What kind of profit could be made by European fur traders and why do you think the Native peoples were happy with the arrangement?
What fell from the sky after the bomb exploded?
A mushroom cloud appeared above Hiroshima after the atomic bomb detonated. The weapon, dubbed "Little Boy," dropped over six miles in 43 seconds before exploding at 2,000 feet in the air.
500 feet from the Aioi Bridge, the bomb exploded with the equivalent force of more than 15,000 tonnes of TNT directly over a surgical clinic. The ensuing reaction caused the city to be enveloped in a dazzling burst of heat and light, and the temperature to quickly approach 7,000 degrees Fahrenheit below ground.
Persons were vaporized half a mile from ground zero, bronze statues melted, roof tiles melted together, and persons facing the blast's exposed flesh were burnt.
As a result, the significance of the fell from the sky after the bomb exploded are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on atomic bomb, here:
https://brainly.com/question/543822
#SPJ1
A discounted loan is one in which the borrower receives the
principal plus the interest at the time the loan is made.
Group of answer choices
True
False
Answer:
False
Explanation:
A discounted loan is one in which the borrower receives the principal plus the interest at the time the loan is made. This statement is False.
A discounted loan is a type of loan where the borrower receives the principal amount of the loan upfront, but the interest is deducted or "discounted" from the principal at the time of loan origination. This means that the borrower receives a reduced amount of funds compared to the full principal, as the interest is taken into account and deducted upfront.The borrower is responsible for repaying the full principal amount, and the interest is essentially paid in advance. The interest deducted upfront represents the cost of borrowing and is based on the anticipated interest that would accrue over the loan term. The borrower is not required to make ongoing interest payments but is still obligated to repay the full principal amount.
In summary, a discounted loan involves the borrower receiving a reduced amount of funds upfront, as the interest is deducted from the principal at the time of loan disbursement. The borrower is still responsible for repaying the full principal amount over the agreed-upon loan term.
To know more about loan disbursement, click here https://brainly.com/question/31789083
#SPJ11
what did president woodrow wilson believe would help to avert future wars?
Answer:
He believed that if he Created a League of Nations it would help avert future wars:))
Explanation:
Was the police response to the pro-Trump January 6th mob biased when compared to police responses to other social justice protests?
Evaluating whether the police response to the pro-Trump January 6th mob was biased compared to responses to other social justice protests is a subjective assessment and can vary based on individual perspectives and interpretations.
The question of whether the police response to the pro-Trump January 6th mob was biased compared to responses to other social justice protests is a complex and multifaceted issue. Here's a step-by-step explanation:
Differential treatment: There are arguments suggesting that the police response on January 6th exhibited bias. Critics point to perceived differences in the level of force used, preparation, and response time compared to some social justice protests. They highlight that law enforcement appeared to be ill-prepared despite advance warnings.Context and circumstances: It's important to consider the unique context of the January 6th event, where a mob stormed the U.S. Capitol building with the intent to disrupt the certification of the 2020 presidential election. The nature of the event and its potential threat to national security may have influenced the response.Comparative analysis: To assess bias, a comprehensive comparative analysis of various social justice protests and the January 6th incident would be necessary. Factors such as the size of the gathering, historical precedents, violence or destruction involved, and the overall behavior of the crowd should be taken into account.Individual incidents: Examining specific incidents within social justice protests, such as the response to the Black Lives Matter movement or other similar demonstrations, can provide insights into potential discrepancies in law enforcement response.Investigation and accountability: Independent investigations, inquiries, and internal reviews can help determine if there were biases in the police response and identify any systemic issues that need to be addressed.It is important to approach this issue with careful consideration, recognizing that it requires thorough analysis of evidence and specific cases to draw conclusions about potential bias in the police response to the January 6th mob compared to other social justice protests.
For more such question on social justice
https://brainly.com/question/15835405
#SPJ8
2. In exactly 250 words, why did the Framers exclude the Bill of
Rights from the original Constitution? Was this a wise decision?
Explain.
The Framers of the U.S. Constitution initially excluded the Bill of Rights from the original document for various reasons, and their decision can be viewed as a wise one considering the historical context and their objectives.
First, it is important to understand the context in which the Constitution was drafted. The Constitutional Convention took place in 1787, just a few years after the American Revolutionary War, and the primary concern of the Framers was to create a strong and effective central government. Many of them believed that explicitly listing individual rights in the Constitution could limit the powers of the federal government and potentially lead to an overly rigid and ineffective governing structure.
Additionally, some Framers argued that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary, as they believed that the Constitution itself already protected individual rights through its structural design and the separation of powers. They believed that the limited and enumerated powers granted to the federal government, coupled with the checks and balances between the branches, would naturally safeguard individual liberties.
However, the exclusion of the Bill of Rights sparked significant debate and opposition from those who believed that explicit protections for individual freedoms were essential. As a compromise, many state ratifying conventions expressed the need for a Bill of Rights, and James Madison played a crucial role in drafting and advocating for the amendments that eventually became the Bill of Rights.
Learn more about Constitution link:
https://brainly.com/question/30337690
#SPJ11
what were among the major reasons for an increase in american imperialism at the end of the nineteenth century?
There were several major reasons for the increase in American imperialism at the end of the nineteenth century. Here are some of the key factors:
How to explain the reasonsEconomic Interests: The United States experienced rapid industrialization and economic growth during the late 19th century.
Naval Power and Strategic Interests: The development of a modern navy, coupled with the construction of the Panama Canal, increased the strategic importance of overseas territories for the United States. These territories served as coaling stations, naval bases, and refueling points, allowing the U.S. to project its military power and protect its interests globally.
National Security and Defense: The U.S. government was concerned about protecting its borders and maintaining national security. Some policymakers believed that acquiring overseas territories would enhance the security of the United States by providing forward bases and preventing potential rivals from gaining a foothold in strategic regions.
Learn more about imperialism on
https://brainly.com/question/472625
#SPJ4
equally distributed and since the In the United States since 1970 income has become 1970s economic mobility among income groups has more; decreased less; increased less; decreased more; increased None of the above answers is correct because economic mobility among income groups cannot be measured.
None of the above answers is correct because economic mobility among income groups cannot be measured accurately by simply stating whether it has increased or decreased.
Economic mobility is a complex and multifaceted concept that encompasses various factors, such as income inequality, social mobility, and opportunities for upward or downward mobility. Economic mobility refers to the ability of individuals or households to move up or down the income ladder over time. It is influenced by numerous factors, including education, skills, social networks, economic policies, and structural factors within the economy. Changes in economic mobility cannot be accurately captured by a single statement or a simple comparison of income distribution between two points in time.To assess economic mobility, researchers use various measures and methodologies, such as intergenerational mobility studies, longitudinal data analysis, and mobility indices. These approaches provide a more nuanced understanding of how individuals or households move across income groups and the factors that contribute to upward or downward mobility.Therefore, the statement that economic mobility among income groups has either increased or decreased in the United States since the 1970s is overly simplistic and does not accurately reflect the complexity of the issue.
To know more about economic mobility, click here https://brainly.com/question/2981557
#SPJ11
Compare and contrast about Ancient Aksum and Ancient Harar Jugol.
Your Brainly Guide
Which diagram best describes the effects of the labor movement on late 19th-century American society?
Answer: B
Explanation: in the past for whatever reason men would disseminate people for their race, sex, ect so we had to put a minimum wage
How it should have been in the first place really
Who was the father of US
Explanation:
The father of the United States, commonly referred to as the "Founding Father" of the nation, is generally attributed to George Washington. He played a crucial role in the American Revolution and served as the Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army. Washington was also unanimously elected as the first President of the United States under the newly ratified U.S. Constitution in 1789. His leadership, statesmanship, and commitment to the principles of liberty and democracy were instrumental in shaping the early foundations of the United States.
Answer:
George Washington
Explanation:
because he done lots of work for the development of the people
what is the history behind june 12th 1993 presidential election acclaimed to have been won by mko abiola
The June 12th, 1993 presidential election in Nigeria is a significant event in the country's history and is closely associated with the figure of Moshood Kashimawo Olawale Abiola (MKO Abiola). The election was held to transition Nigeria from military rule to civilian governance after several years of military dictatorship.
MKO Abiola, a prominent businessman and philanthropist, ran as the candidate of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) in the election. The election was considered one of the freest and fairest in Nigeria's history, with widespread participation and enthusiasm from the Nigerian people.
Abiola's campaign resonated with Nigerians across ethnic and religious lines, and he garnered immense popular support. The election results indicated a clear victory for Abiola, as he won in most of the states, including in the northern part of the country, traditionally seen as a stronghold for his opponent, Bashir Tofa of the National Republican Convention (NRC).
However, before the official announcement of the results, the military regime, led by General Ibrahim Babangida, nullified the election citing alleged irregularities. This move sparked widespread outrage and protests across the country, as Nigerians believed the election had been deliberately annulled to deny Abiola his victory.
The annulment led to a protracted political crisis and further deteriorated the relationship between the military regime and the Nigerian people. Abiola declared himself the rightful winner of the election and insisted on his mandate, leading to his arrest and subsequent imprisonment by the military government.
The June 12th election and its aftermath became a symbol of democratic struggle and the fight against military dictatorship in Nigeria. It galvanized pro-democracy activists, civil society organizations, and the general public, who demanded the restoration of Abiola's mandate and a return to civilian rule.
Unfortunately, the political crisis persisted, and Abiola died in custody on July 7th, 1998, under suspicious circumstances. However, his sacrifice and the June 12th election remained etched in the collective memory of Nigerians and played a pivotal role in shaping the eventual transition to democracy in 1999.
In 1999, after the death of General Sani Abacha and the subsequent transition to civilian rule, Nigeria held a new presidential election, and Olusegun Obasanjo, a former military head of state, emerged as the president. In 2018, the Nigerian government posthumously awarded Abiola the highest national honor, the Grand Commander of the Federal Republic (GCFR), and declared June 12th as Nigeria's Democracy Day in his honor.
for more questions on history
https://brainly.com/question/30149581
#SPJ8
**WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST + AN ADDITIONAL 50 POINTS IF YOUR ANSWER IS CORRECT**
WRITE A CLEAR, SIMPLE ANSWER**
Answer the following questions:
1. What were the effects of exchanges at Tenochtitlan/Mexico City in the sixteenth through eighteenth centuries?
2. Was slavery always racial?
3. How did gunpowder empires ( Ming/Manchu China, Mughal India, Safavid Persia, Ottoman Empire, Russia, Spain and later France and England ) extend their power of people and territories?
how did the african slave trade disrupt the thriving african societies and what were the long term effects of the trade?
The African slave trade had significant and devastating effects on the thriving African societies it targeted.
How did the slave trade affect Africa?The slave trade resulted in the forced removal of millions of Africans from their homelands. Entire communities and families were torn apart, leading to a severe demographic imbalance and population loss.
The slave trade disrupted local economies in Africa. Communities that were once engaged in various economic activities, such as agriculture, trade, and craftsmanship, became vulnerable as able-bodied individuals were captured and taken away.
The slave trade caused social disintegration within African communities. The violence and trauma associated with the slave raids, wars, and the process of enslavement itself led to social upheaval and a breakdown of traditional institutions and cultural practices.
Find out more on the slave trade at https://brainly.com/question/2248530
#SPJ4
President Nixon , like president Johnson , did not want to be the first president of the United State to ————a war.
Richard Nixon was elected the 37th President of the United States (1969-1974) after previously serving as a U.S. Representative and a U.S. Senator.
From 1969 to 1974, Richard Milhous Nixon presided as the 37th president of the United States. He was a Republican who had previously represented and represented California in the Senate. From 1953 to 1961, he served as President Dwight D. Eisenhower's 36th vice president.
Nixon became the only president to resign from office as a result of the Watergate crisis, ending his second term early. Yorba Linda is a city in California. United States, New York City.
Learn more about Richard Nixon here:
https://brainly.com/question/199427
#SPJ1
The Broward Blvd. Exit on Interstate 95 is closed for repairs. Which level
of government is responsible for completing these repairs?
The state government is responsible for completing the repairs on the Broward Blvd. Exit on Interstate 95.
The repairs on the Broward Blvd. Exit on Interstate 95 would be the responsibility of the state government. In the United States, the maintenance and repair of highways and interstates are typically managed by state transportation departments. These departments oversee the planning, construction, and maintenance of the state's transportation infrastructure, including major roadways and highway exits. As such, any necessary repairs, including closures and construction, would be carried out by the state government. This ensures that the roads are safe and functional for motorists. State governments allocate funds and resources to address infrastructure needs and coordinate with local authorities to minimize disruptions during repairs.In conclusion, the responsibility for completing the repairs on the Broward Blvd. Exit on Interstate 95 lies with the state government, specifically the transportation department or agency responsible for managing the state's highways and interstates.
For more such questions on state government:
https://brainly.com/question/16302035
#SPJ8
Which of the following describes the Puritans who settled in New England? They were open and accepting of all religions and started America's move towards becoming a "melting-pot". They were searching for wealth and journeyed across the Atlantic in order to find it. 1 pt O They were excellent farmers who made a lot of money from agriculture. O They were searching for religious freedom for themselves, but were not tolerant of other religions.
Answer:
They were searching for religious freedom for themselves, but were not tolerant of other religions.
Explanation: